Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Stub"
From EEWiki
(Created page with "Hello! Question: What determines something to be of stub class? What about topics that we simply don't have more information on? Is "stubbiness" determined by article length o...") |
Different55 (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hello! Question: What determines something to be of stub class? What about topics that we simply don't have more information on? Is "stubbiness" determined by article length or article comprehensive depth? | Hello! Question: What determines something to be of stub class? What about topics that we simply don't have more information on? Is "stubbiness" determined by article length or article comprehensive depth? | ||
[[User:Hummerz5|Hummerz5]] ([[User talk:Hummerz5|talk]]) 21:41, 22 September 2015 (EDT) | [[User:Hummerz5|Hummerz5]] ([[User talk:Hummerz5|talk]]) 21:41, 22 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
| + | I think it's more a comprehension thing. Stubs are supposed to be incomplete articles that need more content, right? If there's another problem, like if it's messy but still covers everything it needs to, it'd be a cleanup, not a stub. [[User:Different55|Different55]] ([[User talk:Different55|talk]]) 01:55, 25 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:55, 25 September 2015
Hello! Question: What determines something to be of stub class? What about topics that we simply don't have more information on? Is "stubbiness" determined by article length or article comprehensive depth? Hummerz5 (talk) 21:41, 22 September 2015 (EDT) I think it's more a comprehension thing. Stubs are supposed to be incomplete articles that need more content, right? If there's another problem, like if it's messy but still covers everything it needs to, it'd be a cleanup, not a stub. Different55 (talk) 01:55, 25 September 2015 (EDT)
